Comments on: Bubble Nightmares http://anarchyinyourhead.com/2008/06/04/bubble-nightmares/ The Revolution Will Be Doodled! Mon, 05 Dec 2011 14:43:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Jeff http://anarchyinyourhead.com/2008/06/04/bubble-nightmares/comment-page-1/#comment-4420 Jeff Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:48:26 +0000 http://anarchyinyourhead.com/?p=177#comment-4420 Actually Dale, if it's open, you must add the interior surface as well, so it'd be ~4(pi)rh assuming a thickness of ~0. Actually Dale, if it’s open, you must add the interior surface as well, so it’d be ~4(pi)rh assuming a thickness of ~0.

]]> By: rancemuhamitz http://anarchyinyourhead.com/2008/06/04/bubble-nightmares/comment-page-1/#comment-672 rancemuhamitz Thu, 05 Jun 2008 03:04:21 +0000 http://anarchyinyourhead.com/?p=177#comment-672 It's never wrong if you use the chicken to measure it! It’s never wrong if you use the chicken to measure it!

]]> By: Dale http://anarchyinyourhead.com/2008/06/04/bubble-nightmares/comment-page-1/#comment-671 Dale Thu, 05 Jun 2008 01:40:32 +0000 http://anarchyinyourhead.com/?p=177#comment-671 "The cylinder formula is wrong, too." It's correct for an open cylinder. It doesn't include surface area for the ends. For a closed cylinder it would be 2(pi)rh + 2(pi)r^2. “The cylinder formula is wrong, too.”

It’s correct for an open cylinder. It doesn’t include surface area for the ends. For a closed cylinder it would be 2(pi)rh + 2(pi)r^2.

]]>