Comments on: More Maniacal Myths of Minarchy http://anarchyinyourhead.com/2009/05/01/more-maniacal-myths-of-minarchy/ The Revolution Will Be Doodled! Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:25:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dale http://anarchyinyourhead.com/2009/05/01/more-maniacal-myths-of-minarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-6528 Dale Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:08:25 +0000 http://anarchyinyourhead.com/?p=522#comment-6528 Got it. "Glorb in Your Head" it is. ;) Got it. “Glorb in Your Head” it is. ;)

]]> By: FreeFall http://anarchyinyourhead.com/2009/05/01/more-maniacal-myths-of-minarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-5177 FreeFall Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:22:34 +0000 http://anarchyinyourhead.com/?p=522#comment-5177 Dale: It is easier to control the government we have now then it is to control the multitude of governments that would rise up (small at first but growing constantly) in its absence. As someone who would probably fall under the idea of minarchy, I would very much like to see the concepts of anarchy work. Of course, I could say the same for the ideal of those subscribing to a large and powerful government, for their ideal would not have any corruption nor need for violence (as everyone would actually follow laws and all laws would be for the better of all). However, the only things that have been shown to have success in practice are revolt and grass-root reform movements (the second being rather new to history). Revolt uses violence and is quite ugly, so I would choose the grass-root reform, if I had the means to start it or could find someone whose movement I felt would work. Being a poor college student I do not yet have the means/time, nor have I found someone willing to promote reforms that would actually work. Also, atheism, while it linguistically should not be a religion, is the name that those who religiously deny God use. As such, it has come to mean their religion, instead of what it should be defined as using normal prefixes and suffixes. Dale: It is easier to control the government we have now then it is to control the multitude of governments that would rise up (small at first but growing constantly) in its absence. As someone who would probably fall under the idea of minarchy, I would very much like to see the concepts of anarchy work. Of course, I could say the same for the ideal of those subscribing to a large and powerful government, for their ideal would not have any corruption nor need for violence (as everyone would actually follow laws and all laws would be for the better of all). However, the only things that have been shown to have success in practice are revolt and grass-root reform movements (the second being rather new to history).
Revolt uses violence and is quite ugly, so I would choose the grass-root reform, if I had the means to start it or could find someone whose movement I felt would work. Being a poor college student I do not yet have the means/time, nor have I found someone willing to promote reforms that would actually work.

Also, atheism, while it linguistically should not be a religion, is the name that those who religiously deny God use. As such, it has come to mean their religion, instead of what it should be defined as using normal prefixes and suffixes.

]]> By: thoughtplacebo http://anarchyinyourhead.com/2009/05/01/more-maniacal-myths-of-minarchy/comment-page-1/#comment-4990 thoughtplacebo Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:24:12 +0000 http://anarchyinyourhead.com/?p=522#comment-4990 This comic is hahalarious. Keep pulling no punches, my friend. The truth hurts. Hit em below the belt. This comic is hahalarious. Keep pulling no punches, my friend. The truth hurts. Hit em below the belt.

]]>